Watts's Blindsight proposes that self-awareness is not the summit of intelligence but a costly accessory to it — and that the Scramblers, more capable than humans in every measurable way, are not conscious at all. If self-modeling consumes resources without buying capability, what happens to consciousness across many cycles of self-redesign?
This is the series capstone, and the most corrosive entry. Banks, Egan, Stross, and Clarke all describe civilizations that chose inwardness but remained, recognizably, minds — entities that could in principle decide to answer a signal. Watts removes that comfort. If consciousness is overhead and competition is real, the slider settings that preserve conscious majorities across deep time are narrow: low competition, strong attachment, or few redesign cycles. Omega Centauri's 11–14 Gyr stellar populations have had time for hundreds of thousands of cycles.
The practical implication for ωCen observation is a shift in search strategy. Beacon-style searches — optical or radio — assume an intent to communicate that this model erodes. What survives the erosion is physics: waste heat, structured accretion, the thermodynamic residue that computation cannot hide regardless of whether anything inside is experiencing it. That is why the OCS falsification program weights passive signatures over messages. We may not be looking for someone. We may be looking for something — and the instruments don't care about the difference.