Three confirmed ISOs in eight years. What flux does that imply? What fraction could be artificial probes? And what does a null SETI result on 3I/ATLAS actually tell us?
Three interstellar objects have been confirmed as of mid-2026: 1I/ʻOumuamua (2017), 2I/Borisov (2019), and 3I/ATLAS (discovered 1 July 2025). The detection rate of ≈0.4 yr⁻¹ from surveys with efficiency η represents a lower bound on the true passage rate. Current survey completeness for ISOs passing within 5 AU of the Sun is estimated at 10–50%.
The implied true rate is R = N_detected / (T_survey × η) where N_detected = 3, T_survey ≈ 8 yr, and η is your detection efficiency. The inferred per-century rate of "artificial ISOs" is simply R × 100 × P(artificial), where P(artificial) is your prior probability that a given ISO is an artificial probe.
A null SETI result (no signal detected from 3I/ATLAS) is evidence against the artificial hypothesis, but only to the extent that an artificial probe would have been detectable at the achieved sensitivity. The Bayesian update uses:
P(art | null) = P(null | nat) × P(art) / P(null)
where P(null | natural) ≈ 1 (natural objects don't transmit), and P(null | artificial) = P(EIRP < threshold | artificial), which approaches 1 for very faint transmitters. If the probe is silent at the achieved sensitivity, the update is modest. The GBT achieved EIRP < 0.1 W on 3I/ATLAS (Breakthrough Listen, arXiv:2512.18142) — the most sensitive SETI observation of an ISO to date.
Breakthrough Listen / Allen Telescope Array on 3I/ATLAS: arXiv:2512.18142 (Dec 2025). GBT <0.1 W EIRP limit.
FAST narrowband search toward 3I/ATLAS: arXiv:2603.19023 (Mar 2026).
ISO detection rates: Levine et al. (2021), arXiv:2103.07608.