Demo O · Fermi pillar · chains six tools

Five Ways to Look for ET in 60 Seconds

A guided walk through the empirical SETI programme, on priors you choose. Each step deep-links to the relevant tool with the right parameters already loaded — no fetch, no backend, fully shareable.

No backend · No tracking · Works offline · v1.0 · 2026-05-27
⚙ Pick your priors

Choose a starting position. Steps 1–2 inherit the priors directly; steps 3–6 stay at sensible default targets so you can compare programmes on equal footing.

01
Tool 21 · Sandberg/Drexler/Ord 2018
Set the priors — and get a distribution, not a point estimate

The Drake equation almost always appears as a single multiplication. That's wrong by construction: every factor has orders-of-magnitude uncertainty, and propagating the uncertainty changes the answer qualitatively. The Monte Carlo runs 10⁴ samples over your prior cube and returns the posterior on N — including P(N < 1), the probability humanity is alone in the Milky Way.

Open Drake-MC → Bayesian MC Drake formulation
02
Tool 22 · Hanson 1998
Locate the filter — is the bottleneck behind us or ahead?

If N is small, almost all of the survival probability along the path from non-life to galactic civilisation must collapse somewhere. Where matters enormously: a filter behind us (abiogenesis, eukaryogenesis) is reassuring; a filter ahead (industrial collapse, alignment failure) is not. The tool walks the eight Hanson stages and computes the implied joint probability against your N from step 1.

Open Great Filter → Theoretical
03
Tool 23 · Project Ozma 1960 → SKA
Listen at 1.4 GHz — the historical empirical baseline

If they exist, the cheapest way to find them used to be a narrowband carrier in the hydrogen window. Six decades and ~10⁵ targets later: nothing. The sensitivity calculator turns transmitter EIRP, distance, dish area, system temperature, integration time, and bandwidth into a detection floor. Sliding distance out shows how dramatically the assumed transmitter power matters.

Open Radio SETI → Sensitivity
04
Tool 32 · NIROSETI · VERITAS · APF · TMT
Watch for ns laser pulses — different photon regime, different window

Optical photons carry ~10⁵× more energy than 1.4 GHz radio, so a single-shot ns laser pulse can outshine the host star photometrically in its instant. The detection physics is sky-background-limited, not receiver-noise-limited — the sensitivity curve has a different shape than radio. APF Breakthrough Listen, NIROSETI, and the proposed ESO Optical SETI 2040s programme are the empirical anchors.

Open Optical SETI → Photon counting
05
Tool 19 · Wright et al. G-HAT
Look for waste heat — partial Dyson swarms as IR excess

A Kardashev-II civ captures stellar luminosity and re-radiates it at the radiator temperature; the spectral signature shifts from optical to mid-IR. G-HAT surveyed ~10⁵ galaxies for the integrated stellar-light deficit + IR excess. The tool tells you how much panel mass a given swarm coverage actually needs — and where you cross the asteroid-belt budget, the Mercury budget, and the "this isn't engineering, it's geophysics" boundary.

Open Dyson Swarm → Theoretical Engineering
06
Tool 20 · Sandberg/Armstrong/Ćirković 2017 (+ Bennett 2019)
Or — are they hibernating on purpose?

The most uncomfortable answer to the silence: maybe an old enough civ is waiting. The Landauer floor scales with temperature, and the CMB is cooling on cosmological timescales; a sufficiently long nap buys ~10³⁰ extra irreversible operations per joule. Bennett, Hanson & Riedel (2019) push back: today's universe already has cold reservoirs, so the gain is illusory. Both arguments live in the tool; the user picks who they believe.

Open Aestivation → Hypothesis Speculative
The detection rate so far, across all five programmes: zero

That is consistent with at least five different worlds: a Sandberg-style prior where N < 1 is unsurprising; a Great Filter behind us; a Great Filter ahead; a Kardashev-II population that lives in waste-heat regimes we haven't surveyed deeply enough; or a population that has chosen, for thermodynamic reasons, to be silent for now.

Each tool above tells you what observation would change its row. For the IMBH-evidence companion to this same question — what observation would falsify the central Omega Centauri claim — see the Falsification & Observational Roadmap.

EPISTEMIC TIERS: Established = peer-reviewed physics within the standard formulation. Theoretical = published framework with active debate or unconfirmed inputs. Speculative = engineering or philosophical extrapolation, clearly labelled.