📻 DRAFT RESEARCH PROPOSAL · DEEP PULSAR TIMING · MEERKAT → SKA-MID

MeerKAT Long-Baseline Pulsar Timing: Definitive Gravitational Potential Map of Omega Centauri

A 5-year high-precision timing program targeting 20+ OC millisecond pulsars to constrain the central mass distribution at ~10⁻⁹ m/s² acceleration sensitivity — delivering Bayesian model discrimination between single IMBH and dark cluster hypotheses before LISA (~2035) · Working draft · April 2026

Relation to companion proposal: The MeerKAT/SKA 3-year PTA proposal is the discovery-phase program; this 5-year program is the precision-phase follow-up with expanded science goals. They can be submitted together as a staged program or independently.

1. Scientific Rationale

1.1 Quantitative Science Case

MeerKAT's timing precision for OC MSPs (flux densities ~10–100 µJy; integration ~1 hr each):

Timing precision (ToA): ~1–3 µs per 1-hr session (bright MSPs) Acceleration sensitivity: δa_los = c × δṖ/P = c × (δσ_ToA) / (P × T²) After T = 5 years, σ_ToA = 2 µs: δa_los ≈ (3×10⁸ m/s × 2×10⁻⁶ s) / (3×10⁻³ s × (5×3.15×10⁷ s)²) δa_los ≈ 8×10⁻¹² m/s² per bright MSP [corrected: 6×10²/(3×10⁻³×2.48×10¹⁶) = 8×10⁻¹²] Expected acceleration from 30,000 M☉ IMBH at r = 0.3 pc: a_los ≈ GM/r² × cos(i) ≈ 4×10⁻⁸ m/s² (mean projection) Detection significance: 4×10⁻⁸ / 8×10⁻¹² ≈ 5,000σ — highly decisive (conclusion unchanged)

1.2 Model Discrimination Power

ObservableSingle IMBH (≥8,200 M☉)Dark cluster (~2–3×10⁵ M☉)
Radial acceleration profileSteep gradient, consistent with 1/r²Shallower, more extended profile
Central acceleration amplitudeHigh: ~10⁻⁷–10⁻⁶ m/s² for inner MSPsLower: ~10⁻⁸–10⁻⁷ m/s²
Higher-order derivatives (jerk)Detectable after 4+ years for inner MSPsDetectable but extended spatial distribution
Bayesian evidence ratioExpected B₁₂ ≫ 10 (decisive) after 5 yearsExpected B₁₂ ≫ 10 favoring extended model

1.3 Extended Science: Jerk and Spin Constraints

2. Observation Strategy

ParameterValue
CadenceBi-weekly (26 sessions/year); sessions ~5 hr each (cluster transit)
Pulsars targetedAll 18+ confirmed OC MSPs; priority on <0.5 pc projected separation
Integration per pulsar1 hr per session (group observations; parallelised with sub-array)
Frequency bandsL-band (1.28 GHz) + UHF (816 MHz); dual-band for DM corrections
New MSP discoveriesCommensal deep search expected to find 5–10 additional MSPs
SKA-MID transitionProgram continues on SKA-MID (~2030+) for 5× timing precision improvement
Total MeerKAT time (5 yr)~1,300 hours (reduced from raw 1,500 hr via sub-arraying)

3. Work Plan

YearMilestoneDeliverable
1MeerKAT time allocation; timing pipeline; initial ephemeridesYear-1 timing baseline
2First acceleration measurements; preliminary potential mapConference results
3Radial acceleration profile; initial IMBH vs dark cluster Bayesian testPaper #1 (early constraints)
4Jerk measurements; strong model discriminationPaper #2 (model comparison)
5Full Bayesian reconstruction; SKA-MID handoff preparationPaper #3 (definitive constraints); public dataset

4. Budget

ItemCost (USD)
PI (0.2 FTE × 5 yr)400,000
Co-I × 2 (0.15 FTE × 5 yr)600,000
Postdoc × 2 (1.0 FTE × 5 yr)950,000
Graduate student (1.0 FTE × 5 yr)275,000
MeerKAT time + operational costs250,000
Computing (Bayesian inference, TEMPO2/enterprise)200,000
Travel + publications + fringe225,000
Total~$2.9M (5 yr)

5. References

  1. Bañares-Hernández, A., et al. (2025). New constraints on OC central mass via MSP timing. A&A, 693, A104.
  2. Häberle, M., et al. (2024). Fast-moving stars in ω Cen. Nature, 631, 285.
  3. González Prieto, A., et al. (2025). Growing the IMBH in ω Cen. ApJL, 990, L69.
  4. Chen, W., et al. (2024). MeerKAT + Parkes MSP census; 18 confirmed pulsars.
  5. Prager, B. J., et al. (2017). Using pulsars to probe the potential well of NGC 6752. ApJ, 845, 148.
  6. Freire, P. C. C., et al. (2017). Timing MSPs in globular clusters as IMBH probes. ApJ, 675, 670.
  7. Babak, S., et al. (2017). LISA EMRI science. Phys. Rev. D, 95, 103012.
Working draft · April 2026 · The 5-year program requires sustained MeerKAT access beyond standard TAC allocations; a large program or partnership proposal with SARAO is recommended. ← Return to omegacentauri.me

Relevant tools

Pulsar Timing Array
MSP timing residuals as mass probe
Velocity Dispersion
Stellar kinematics mass estimator
IMBH Evidence Dashboard
Live multi-constraint overview
Spin-up Timeline
IMBH spin history via accretion